Search
 
 

Practices

 

Search

FILTERS

  • Please search to find attorneys
Close Btn
Ruth A. Horvatich

Ruth A. Horvatich

Attorney

Ruth represents and counsels employers in a broad range of labor and employment law matters. Ruth maintains a national labor and employment practice assisting her clients in all types of employment disputes, including discrimination/harassment litigation, employment-related contract disputes, and labor negotiations. From day-to-day issues to litigation, Ruth offers her clients a full range of services. 


Growing up on a farm in rural Nebraska taught her the value of hard work and integrity, which shows in her practice. She gives each client personal attention and cost-effective solutions that are driven by her experience, expertise, and values.

Ruth has experience in all aspects of litigation including trial work, arbitration, and mediation in federal and state courts along with administrative agencies. Her practice includes defending corporate clients in litigation brought by employees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), and several other federal and state employment laws.

Ruth has been selected as a Great Plains Super Lawyers Rising Star in the practice area of Employment and Labor law and is ranked in Chambers USA as an up-and-coming attorney for Labor & Employment law in Nebraska.

Education
  • Creighton University School of Law (J.D., Magna Cum Laude, 2011)
  • Wayne State College (B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 2006)
Admissions
  • Iowa (2011)
  • Nebraska (2011: Sustaining Member)
  • South Dakota (2022)
  • U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska (2011)
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa (2012)
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of Iowa (2018)
  • U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois (2018)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit (2013)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (2018)
07/20/2022

McGrath North Attorneys Awarded The Most Top Chambers Rankings

McGrath North continues its tradition in 2022 of being highly recognized for excellence by Chambers USA – America’s Leading Lawyers for Business, with 25 McGrath North attorneys receiving special recognition in their legal practice areas, and 7 core practice areas being ranked for excellence. These recognitions include:  


READ MORE
07/13/2022

McGrath North Practice Groups Receive Chambers USA 2022 Recognition For Excellence

Chambers USA 2022 has recognized the excellence of seven core practice areas of McGrath North, and 25 of its attorneys practicing within those groups. “We work hard to continually build our core practice areas central to supporting our business clients,” said Roger Wells, President of McGrath North. “These efforts start with our summer clerk program, and continues with the development of our attorneys at all career stages, positioning them to serve our clients with excellence and receive these high honors.”  


READ MORE
07/29/2021

Labor, Employment and Immigration Law Under Biden: Where are We and Where are We Headed?

Webinar  


READ MORE
01/14/2021

COVID-19 Best Practices: Managing Your Workforce During the Pandemic (BAHRA)

 


READ MORE

Publications

More Publications
06/13/2022

Elon Musk Demands Tesla Employees To Return To The Office Or Quit: Can He Really Require That?

Recently, Tesla Inc.’s CEO Elon Musk reportedly sent an email to all his employees demanding they return to the office and cease solely working from home. Musk specifically told employees “Everyone at Tesla is required to spend a minimum of 40 hours in the office per week,” and that “the office must be where your actual colleagues are located, not some remote pseudo office. If you don’t show up, we will assume you have resigned.” Can Musk legally require employees able to work remotely from home to work in the office or be terminated? The answer is yes, with some considerations.  


READ MORE
03/03/2022

Nebraska Imposes COVID-19 Vaccine Exemption Requirements On Employers

A new Nebraska law, passed as Legislative Bill 906 and signed by Governor Pete Ricketts, requires Nebraska employers who mandate COVID-19 vaccinations to grant religious and medical exemptions to most applicants and employees seeking such exemptions.  


READ MORE
 
  • Iowa State Bar Association
  • Nebraska State Bar Association
  • Omaha Bar Association
  • American Bar Association
  • Lead Articles Editor, Creighton Law Review
  • Author, “The Long and Short of it: The Securities and Exchange Commission Should Reinstate a Price Restriction Test to Regulate Short Selling,” Creighton Law Review, Vol. 43, Issue 2, p. 593-636 (2010).
  • National Trial Advocacy Competition
  • Listed: Great Plains Super Lawyers Rising Star (Employment & Labor) 2019-2021
  • Listed: Chambers USA, America’s Leading Lawyers for Business (Nebraska, Labor & Employment – Up-and-Coming)
  • Dick v. Koski Professional Group, P.C., et al., 307 Neb. 599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (Neb. 2020) - Counsel representing a shareholder pursuing claims against a professional corporation. The corporation pursued seven counterclaims against the shareholder including breach of fiduciary duties, utilizing confidential information and misappropriation of trade secrets and was seeking a multi-million dollar damages award. After a lengthy jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of the shareholder and the jury rejected all of the counterclaims asserted by the corporation. The decision was appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court on 15 assignments of error. By unanimous decision, the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the jury verdict in its entirety and rejected the appeal in an 87-page opinion. The case will serve as precedent in Nebraska because it addresses numerous issues relating to the enforcement of shareholder agreements, fiduciary duties owed by shareholders and officers of a corporation, misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential information among other topics.
  • Haffke v. Signal 88, LLC, 306 Neb. 625, 947 N.W.2d 103 (Neb. 2020) – Lead counsel representing an employer in a lawsuit brought by an employee asserting whistleblower claims. After the jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of the employer on all claims and the case was appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court. In an unanimous opinion, the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the jury verdict in its entirety.
  • Travelex Insurance Services, Inc. v. Lynn Barty, 970 F.3d 1066 (8th Cir. 2020) - Counsel representing an employer in a lawsuit brought against a former manager alleging claims for breach of restrictive covenants under an employment agreement. After the district court concluded that the employment agreement was unenforceable as a matter of law, an appeal was filed. The Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's decision in favor of the employer and remanded the case for further proceedings.
  • Ronald Ring v. Lanoha Nursersies, Inc., No. 8:17-cv-00235 (D. Neb. 2019) – Counsel representing an employer in a lawsuit brought by an employee asserting interference, discrimination and retaliation claims pursuant to the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). After a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of the employer.
  • Fenceroy v. Gelita USA, Inc., 941 N.W.2d 37 (Table), 2019 WL 5791013 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018) – Lead counsel defending an employer against employment claims for race discrimination and harassment. During the course of the litigation, the case was appealed to the Iowa Supreme Court to address issues relating to the production of attorney-client privileged information. The case was later dismissed on summary judgment in favor of the employer and the plaintiff appealed. By unanimous decision, the Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of the employer.
  • Alcegaire v. JBS USA, LLC, 2018 WL 3058877 (W.D. Ky 2018) – Lead counsel defending an employer against employment claims for interference in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and workers’ compensation retaliation. The District Court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment and also denied the plaintiff employee’s motion to alter or amend the judgment.
  • Lacy v. Valmont Industries, Inc., 2016 WL 3014656 (D. Neb. 2016) – Counsel in the District of Nebraska where the court granted a motion to dismiss in favor of the employer on claims asserted under ERISA for alleged violations of COBRA rights.